On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 01:49:23AM +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > the MBF did not include the packages that use pidof in initscripts. And > there is pretty much no overlap between packages using pidof in their > initscripts and at runtime, so it is still possible to do a mini-MBF focused > on replacing the direct use of pidof in initscripts.
I see. Yes, fine! I think if we get this lightweight transparent solution up we can avoid another MBF; I would prefer to suggest considered improvements on a case by case basis for affected packages at leisure. Thanks!
