Hi! On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 10:01 AM Sergei Golovan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 9:39 AM Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Source: lua-sql > > Version: 2.7.0-2 > > Severity: serious > > Control: close -1 2.8.1-2 > > Tags: sid forky > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: out-of-sync > > > > If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues > > beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. > > > > As far as I can tell, this is indeed a bug, which is caused by > addition of the lua-duckdb binary package. The problem is that duckdb > is shipped only for 64-bit little endian architectures, therefore > lua-sql 2.8.1-2 is stuck in the BD-Uninstallable state on other > architectures (armhf, i386, s390x etc.). I guess lua-duckdb should be > built (and lua-sql should build-depend on libduckdb-dev respectively) > only for 64-bit little endian architectures. I don't know how to > better do that: use a whitelist of arches to build on or a blacklist > of arches not to build on. Or maybe there is a better way?
Would it work to build-depend on libduckdb-dev | architecture-is-32-bit | architecture-is-big-endian ? Cheers! -- Sergei Golovan
