On 23/05/26 10:25 pm, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 23/05/26 10:17 pm, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23/05/26 9:27 pm, Simon Richter wrote:
>>> Package: lintian
>>> Version: 2.122.0
>>
>> Is this reproducible with the latest version?
>>
>>> Severity: normal
>>> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a package with two tarballs,
>>>
>>> ….orig.tar.xz
>>> …-database.orig.tar.gz
>>>
>>> The git repository that the .orig.tar.xz is built from also contains a
>>> "database" directory, which should be excluded, so debian/copyright has
>>> "Files-Excluded: database/*", and uscan correctly excludes these files from
>>> the tarball.
>>>
>>> The second tarball then provides a replacement "database" directory.
>>>
>>> Lintian complains about each file in this directory, claiming that it is
>>> excluded but present in the tarball, without checking which tarball
>>> provides that file.
>> Will you please provide the exact package and the version and the false
>> positives please?
>>
>> It's not entirely clear to me from the bug report, and having an exact
>> reproducer would help
>> to debug this much more quickly.
> src:radiant has MUT [1]
>
> [radiant_2.8.1+dfsg-3.dsc]
> [radiant_2.8.1+dfsg.orig-debian-tests-data.tar.xz]
> [radiant_2.8.1+dfsg.orig.tar.xz]
> [radiant_2.8.1+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz]
>
> But I don't see any oddities in lintian output [2]
This does not have the same issue as the files being in 2 tarballs; but the
original package
and reproducer would help.
> [1] https://packages.debian.org/unstable/radiant
> [2]
> https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?email1=&email2=&email3=&packages=radiant&ignpackages=&format=html<_error=on<_warning=on<_information=on<_pedantic=on<_experimental=on&lintian_tag=#all
