Hi, On 2026-05-17 00:54, Florian Bezdeka wrote: > Hi Aurelien, > > On Mon, 2026-04-13 at 00:13 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > Yes, packages go through -proposed-updates before going to (old-)stable > > for a point release. But far less people are using that than testing, so > > I am not sure about the coverage we'll get. But if we decide to apply > > the patch series, we need to do that just after the point release to > > increase the testing time and the chance to catch issues. > > The point release (12.14) has been released a couple of days ago. Sadly > we did not get any further comments / input / feedback regarding this > issue. How do we proceed now?
On my side, I still not sure how to get this patchset properly tested, especially for the db5.3 case. The only option I see is to get the package into stable-proposed-updates, ask users to test it and cross our fingers that any issues are detected before the point release. But that's not feel very comfortable though. > Our tests are still ongoing, all looking good so far. No additional > issues came up. I would love to increase the test coverage and to move > forward, but options seem limited. Great. Have your tests covered the db5.3 case as well? Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://aurel32.net
