Control: severity -1 normal Hi Xavier,
This bug was about the package not building on armhf which upstream claimed to have solved with the already referenced upstream bug https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-imapd/issues/4876. The new FTBFS on armhf is unrelated. If you want to handle this Debian bug as i386 FTBFS now, that is fine for me. However, neither i386 nor armhf FTBFS make this a serious issue because they are not regressions (not available on testing). In general, it is not a good idea to restrict the architecture list just to spare the buildds some build time. This has kept loong64 from building. Thanks, Bastian
