Hi,

Pascal Hambourg <[email protected]> wrote (Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:38:31 
+0200):
> On 19/07/2026 at 21:04, Kevin Locke wrote:
> > 
> > I can confirm that the ISO from Salsa CI does not produce the
> > "Partition(s) 1 on /dev/sda have been written, but [...]" error
> > message.  However, it does still overwrite the USB stick.  Is that
> > expected?
> 
> Yes. The netboot installer included in mini.iso images does not mount a 
> local installation media, it loads everything from a network mirror. To 
> simulate the cdrom installer included in netinst and DVD images, you 
> need to mount the installation media by hand.
> 
> Note: when a isohybrid image is written to a USB drive /dev/sdX, the 
> cdrom installer mounts the partition /dev/sdX1 instead of the entire 
> device /dev/sdX (because it scans USB partitions before entire disks, do 
> not ask me why). So you also need to test with a mounted partition.
> 
> > One other idea we haven't discussed, which might be helpful to
> > distinguish the use cases you outlined from missing disks, would be to
> > prompt the user to modify the installer media.  For example:
> 
> I also had this idea as a last resort.
> 
> > "No disks were detected other than the one containing this installer.
> > Installing to this disk will modify the installer media.  Continue?"
> Prompting only when there is no other disk would break the use case 
> where there is another disk and the user still wants to install on the 
> disk containing installation media. IMO it should not matter whether 
> there are other disks or not.

I would be unhappy with adding one more question to all installations/
all installation media.

Can we manage to display this new message only on netboot image
installations?


Holger




-- 
Holger Wansing <[email protected]>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

Reply via email to