Tim Brown [29/Aug 1:53pm +01] wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > Given Debian's decision on AI and LLM usage, perhaps something like: > > [X-]AI-Usage: none | optional | required > [X-]AI-Dependency: none | local | external > [X-]AI-Assisted: none | packaging | source | documentation | ... > > in the control file would be a go'er? > > Would at least encourage transparency and choice for those of us that care. I > wonder if that would be consistent with the resolution as voted for? > > Note. I'm not tied to any specific fieldnames or direction on how they are > used > - there are many excellent DD who might be able to solve that. However, I'm > proposing X variants in the hope that even without a policy change, those that > care can start the process towards transparency now.
We would want something like this to happen in the archive first, not in Policy first. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
