Marc Haber <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 01:37:57PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>I'm in the sssd-team on Salsa and made some uploads, and I now sent an
>>Salsa invite for 'sunweaver' to become Maintainer of the sssd-team on
>>Salsa.  Unless someone objects, I suggest that you push to the real sssd
>>git project instead of your fork.  There seems to be nobody else
>>actively working on it anyway.
>
> Yes please!
>
> Add me as well, please.

What is your Salsa username?

I'm not sure how I got maintainer access to the project, so I hope I'm
not abusing it by inviting you and others who express interest.  Any
improvements to the 'sssd' package seems useful though, so pending any
objections, let's just proceed.  My focus in the sssd-team has been the
*-wrapper packages because I use them personally.

> There is also a NMU announcement by a new DD, please get in touch with
> them as well to consider adding them to the team.

Do you have a pointer?  Wasn't that 'sunweaver'?

>>What do you think about moving all of these projects into the /debian/
>>Salsa namespace?
>
> Yes please. A possible reason for NOT moving is that sssd is somewhat
> security related and we might not want joe random DD to push to
> debian/latest. That's at least the reason why sudo is not in the
> /debian/ Salsa namespace.

Yeah, I understand this concern, however I think it is weak: if someone
abuses the powers, the rest of us 1) can clean up the mess by
force-pushing restoring things, and 2) that person will have burned
their credibility on Salsa.  I'm hoping the social pressure to behave
will be sufficient.  But there is no rush on this, let's see how
team-maintainance can work going forward.

>>We could also change the Maintainer field to some
>>group with more participators, such as the pkg-security or Debian
>>Commons teams.  Both changes may bring more new contributors, as more
>>people will be able to commit improvements and/or feel entitled to work
>>on sssd-related projects.
>
> I'd prefer Maintainer: Debian SSSD Maintainers <[email protected]>
> and named Uploaders.
>
> But everything that moves in any direction is better than just staying
> with the current state.

Indeed.  I don't care strongly about any of these packages, and I am
happy people step up to help, so just want to promote that.

/Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to