Hi,

By looking at the Red Hat package [1], CVE-2026-5674 seems to be fixed
by several commits:
- 6bc07dfe: only dlopen from the defined search paths
- 821b62da: dlopen: improve prefix check some more
- 8be0d753: dlopen: support search path ending in /
- 0b117921: filter-graph: error when there are no valid nodes
- aae60d8d: filter-graph: relax LADSPA plugin loading

All these commits landed in the branch 1.6 in April/May before the
release 1.6.6.
This is still to be confirmed, but I'd say CVE-2026-5674 is fixed since 1.6.6.

[1] 
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/pipewire/-/commit/bebe5357bc8faee5dd22317b0e1ce624f7ce1a16

Best regards,
Dylan

Le dim. 19 juil. 2026 à 16:19, Salvatore Bonaccorso
<[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Source: pipewire
> Version: 1.6.8-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: security upstream
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], Debian Security Team 
> <[email protected]>
>
> Hi,
>
> The following vulnerability was published for pipewire.
>
> Can you please check with upstream, at time of writing this bugreport
> only the Red Hat bugzilla entry was available. So it is unclear if
> this is known upstream, tracked upstream, fixed upstream or else.
>
> CVE-2026-5674[0]:
> | A flaw was found in PipeWire, a multimedia server. This
> | vulnerability allows an attacker to escape sandboxed applications,
> | such as Flatpak, by exploiting PipeWire's PulseAudio compatibility
> | layer. An attacker with minimal permissions within a sandboxed
> | environment can load a malicious library, leading to arbitrary code
> | execution outside the sandbox and potential compromise of the user's
> | system.
>
>
> If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
> CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.
>
> For further information see:
>
> [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-5674
>     https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5674
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2455341
>
> Please adjust the affected versions in the BTS as needed.
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore

Reply via email to