On 10/11/26 6:10 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I agree that I am allowed to deviate from upstream, but disagree that
it is sensible - I would consider that a fork, which I am not willing
to maintain:

If I patch rustls to use ring by default, then any downstream consumer
of rustls that expects aws-lc-sys to be in use will fail.

It's a fork either way, but removing a supposedly always-available default feature breaks 100% of downstream consumers, while ring vs aws-lc-sys is some internal implementation detail. :)

Reply via email to