retitle 377942 RM: electric -- RoQA; unmaintained; semi-obsolete close 377942 thanks
Re: Kai Hendry 2006-07-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > My hope is that Java electric does get eventually get packaged though > > > its current buggy C version in Debian should be removed. > > Popcon reports >100 users, and the package has 0 RC/important bugs. > > Imho it should only be removed once the Java-Version is in the > > archive. > > I've already opened a bug for its removal. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=377942 I've removed the "RC" bit (and the "low-usage") from the title since it's not true, and closed it. > I'm inexperienced when it comes to these matters. If you think it is a > good idea to give this upstream unmaintained code in, then fine. I'm all for removing crap, but if a simple B-D bump resolves the issue... If anyone still wants electric to go, please reopen #377942, I won't object. > I've quickly prepared an NMU: > http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/unstable/electric_6.05-2.2_i386.changes Uploaded as 6.05-3. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature