Package: bacula-doc Severity: normal The "fixed" version of bacula-doc declares:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), tetex-bin, tetex-base, tetex-extra However, this should instead be: Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), tetex-extra | texlive-latex-recommended, tetex-extra | texlive-fonts-recommended as I wrote in the original bug report. tetex-base does not provide any functionality that is needed for building bacula-doc. bacula would start to FTBFS in case we finally establish our planned new package naming scheme, where tetex-base might disappear. What you need is tetex-extra (and, if you like, tetex-bin; but tetex-extra always has depended on tetex-bin, and will always continue to do so). Secondly, please add the texlive packages, too. teTeX is dead upstream, texlive will be in etch, and teTeX will vanish after etch. Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
