* Tetralet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >The author of the patch had sent it already. > >For more details, Please visit: > > > >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271815 > >http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158678 > > > >Thanks! ^_^ > > > > > >BTW, > >I have sent this patch to the upstream bugzilla. > >Please visit https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282422 for > >more details. > >(Becouse this patch is a little different from the patch for mozilla) > > > > > Hi, > > I find mozilla-firefox had updated to 1.0.1-2 in sid yesterday, > But this patch was not applied in that release. >_____< > > We can just replace > /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/components/libwidget_gtk2.so with patched one > before mozilla-firefox 1.0+dfsg.1-5, > So that we can simply share this file to the other linux users to apply > this patch. > > but after mozilla-firefox 1.0+dfsg.1-5, > the libwidget_gtk2.so was compiled within the firefox-bin, > therefore it is no easy way to share this patch to the other linux users. > They must download and replace whole mozilla-firefox package! > It is not very convenient. > > So, Please consider to apply this patch. thanks.
I have considered it, and I'd like to see some comments from an one of the Mozilla developers about the patch, since I don't feel qualified to judge it. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
