On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:18:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > since upstream is not willing to integrate a runtime check in the short > > term and I cannot support such an intrusive unofficial patch (which, BTW, > > does not exist at all ATM). > > Why do you say that it would be intrusive? It looks to me like a simple > change to support building more than one select interface at a time, and > using the best one that works. If such a patch existed, would you consider > applying it?
I'd surely be willing to do so for rageircd. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]