On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:42:31AM +1200, Mark Robinson wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:58:20AM +1200, Mark Robinson wrote: > >>Matt Zimmerman wrote: > >>>On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:51:42AM +1200, Mark Robinson wrote: > >>>>I have several times seen it flag MD5SUM errors where the expected > >>>>MD5SUM and that computed are identical. > >>>I would be interested to see verbatim copies of such errors. > >>>>Computed MD5: 79d0311df375b8fe66ba0a97c5b1b069 Expected MD5: > >>>>79d0311df375b8fe66ba0a97c5b1b069 > > > >These don't match. > > eh ? > > >>>> Computed MD5: 79d0311df375b8fe66ba0a97c5b1b069 Expected MD5: > >>>> 79d0311df375b8fe66ba0a97c5b1b069
That one isn't a failure; in verbose mode, it prints the MD5 in every case. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
