On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:32:11PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.25.1524 +0100]:
> > This is something you can do by limiting the candidate profiles for an
> > interface in the mapping stanza.
> No, that's the wrong way around. :)
> I know I can use limits in the mapping stanza, but i really would
> like to be able to limit a configuration to an interface/mapping
> name. It just seems more logical...

The way I understand ifupdown to work is to provide configuration
stanzas that don't know about the actual names of the physical
interfaces, and mapping stanza that define the mapping.  So I'll limit
myself to that.

However, please feel free to reopen the bug.  I'll tag it wontfix, but
I'll be happy to apply a patch that closes it if someone provides it.


Ciao,

Enrico

-- 
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to