[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M. Bishop) wrote: > Thanks for the patch, but I don't like it.
[laugh] I'm not surprised; my C skills are extremely rusty through long neglect. My apologies for applying my dull axe to your code. :) > Can I propose a different patch that only causes the file to be > re-read if the modification time or the access time or the size of the > file changes. For this particular problem the file size does change, > so this should pick it up. Looks like it would work just fine. If this gets folded into the next update, I think we can call this bug closed. Thanks for your effort! Regards, * Ben Okopnik * Editor-in-Chief, Linux Gazette * http://LinuxGazette.NET * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
