Am Mittwoch, den 06.09.2006, 00:59 +0900 schrieb Michael(tm) Smith: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2006-09-05 15:23 +0200:
[Should the workaround be mentioned in upstream docs?] > > See above. Don't put anything system specific into the docs. It's also > > possible, that one day this patch will be dropped, because of a better > > solution or any issues and then upstream docs may be outdated (and > > wrong) then. So I really don't think it's a good idea to put this into > > upstream docs. > > And my point is that if it's not put into the upstream docs (and > believe me, I'm not disagreeing that is shouldn't be), then it the > patch should be dropped from Debian. You otherwise will have users > who have no idea where the default value is coming from. I could simply add a note [1] to the xsl:message, where you (upstream) output, which format is used (fo/docbook.xsl -> root.messages). IMHO this is enough to make users aware of this little workaround. [1] E.g.: "See /usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl/README.Debian for more information." Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
