Kai Hendry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 0.2016-1 was never uploaded to Debian, so I can't this being a problem.
>
> Only 0.5 was finally uploaded.

Indeed, there is only 0.5-1 version listed in PTS [1].

I was confused, because I have recommended python-flup (>=0.2015-1) in
my pastescript package after reading python-flup's changelog (since
0.2015-1 your package is new python policy ready) and now debcheck is
complaining [2]. Maybe changing "unstable" to "UNRELEASED" in all
unreleased versions of your package would be a good idea (so nobody
else will be confused).

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/flup.html
[2] http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=pastescript

-- 
-=[     Piotr Ozarowski     ]=-
-=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-

Attachment: pgpIfML66NZvg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to