Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >... > On top of that, I try to apply this interdiff generated patch: > > diff -u pciutils-2.1.11/debian/dirs pciutils-2.1.11/debian/dirs > --- pciutils-2.1.11/debian/dirs > +++ pciutils-2.1.11/debian/dirs > @@ -6,0 +7 @@ > +var/lib/pciutils > > and git-apply says: > > error: debian/dirs: already exists in working directory > > I suspect it's confused by the '-x,0' thinking that means "file does not > exist" rather than "we have 0 context for this diff".
There are a few safety checks we perform assuming that the patch has a few lines of context, and this is falsely triggering one of them. It incorrectly thinks that seeing _no_ context nor old lines in the patch means this is a file creation patch, and complains because it knows the file being patched already exists. I am looking into a way to handle a context-less patch line the one quoted, without breaking the sanity check we have. In the meantime you should be able to work things around by not feeding --unified=0 diff output. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
