also sprach Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.21.0046 +0200]: > Please attach your command-line and the 00list contents to illustrate > what your problem is, and if possible, a proposed patch to fix what > you find is the problem.
$ apt-get source -d mdadm
[...]
$ tar xzf mdadm_2.5.3.git200608202239.orig.tar.gz
$ mv mdadm-2.5.3.git200608202239.orig mdadm-2.5.3.git200608202239
$ svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-mdadm/mdadm/trunk/debian \
mdadm-2.5.3.git200608202239/debian
[...]
$ cd mdadm-2.5.3.git200608202239
$ make -C debian/patches
[...]
$ cat debian/patches/00list
01-mdadm.conf-location
50-superblock-partition-limit
80-md.txt
80-raid5-vs-raid10-doc
80-rootraiddoc
$ dpatch-edit-patch 50-superblock-partition-limit
[...]
dpatch-edit-patch: Warning: 50-superblock-partition-limit.dpatch is
not listed in debian/patches/00list, no other patches will be
applied to the working directory.
Looking at this again, I now realise that this is because
dpatch-edit-patch calls clean, which deletes the
dynamically-generated 00list file. Thus, I guess this is not really
a bug since I am doing stuff that I probably should not do. I just
don't like having to manually maintain 00list as well, so I let the
Makefile handle it.
I'll leave it up to you to close this.
Cheers,
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
