On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:22:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:12:42PM -0400, H. S. wrote: > > (here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda)
> Thanks. geda-gschem 20060906 should be in etch in a day or two. Not if this RC bug is open, it won't be. > system-gafrc is provided by geda-symbols, which is already updated in > etch. However system-gschemrc is not yet. I suspect the skew between > them is causing the problem. I will tighten the dependencies in the > future. If you're certain that this is the cause, which package needs to be updated with added conflicts -- geda-symbols or geda-gschem? If it's geda-symbols, could you please reassign this bug there? If the change needs to be made to geda-gschem, please say so and I'll override this RC bug for the update into testing for now. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
