On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:32:57 +0200 Kai Wb. wrote: [...] > Hi, > only a short question: Is there some good reason why we should not > integrate the proposed patch (by Albert Cahalan on debburn-devel [1] > or [2]) which would fix the license problems? [...] > [1] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/000064.html > [2] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/000066.html [...]
IMHO, one good reason is that a qualified lawyer should be consulted first. See my reply on debian-legal (that has not yet shown up on debburn-devel, probably because it's still in the moderator queue: I'm not a subscriber...): http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/09/msg00126.html -- But it is also tradition that times *must* and always do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_ ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpnmGRe5w3Hq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
