Quoting Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:02:29 -0500, Jon Marler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > This bug is being closed as it is not a bug. It was a request from > > a translator to make a change that I disagree with. As the package > > maintainer, I am allowed to make that decision. > > While the person filing the bug may have been a translator, > this was discussed on -devel, and a broad concensus reached. This is > not a one off request, there is a nascent policy that debconf notes > are only meant for critical information all installer must see. Low > priority notes vioalte that. > > > This constant harassment over this bug is becoming quite annoying. > > Then just fix your bloody package, man.
I did not see a vote on any policy changes. Policy changes require a vote, and I don't remember any vote. You have not addressed any of the concerns in my last email, most notably the fact that I contend this violates section 4 of the social contract. I'm not "fixing the bloody package, man" as I do not see it as broken. Don't you people have anything better to do than harass me over something as trivial as the severity of a message in a debconf file? I mean ... honestly ... Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
