I see the arguments just alibistic, nothing more.
1, I don't have any problem to claim, that at least 90% of users do use
mail client just for the purposes of mail client. For them, Thunderbird
IS an equivalent for Evolution. Moreover, Evolution is just too heavy
and complicated tool for them.
2, By exactly Your logic, Epiphany couldn't be even compared with
Firefox. It contains some 5% of Firefox functionality, not taking into
account the Firefox's add-on mechanism.
3, In our enterprise, we want desktop to be as much consistent as
possible. We need the same applications to be available both on Windows
and Linux desktop. Therefore we do use Moziila Firefox and Mozilla
Thunderbird; Nor epiphany of Evolution could do this.
4, <flame> Epiphany is just too ugly (call it "consistent" if U wish).
I'd never offer it to our users. </flame>
5, <rumors> Epiphany imposes web compatibility problems even in cases
where Firefox dosen't have any problem. </rumors>
6, Epiphany offers zero extension potential compared with Firefox. Not
that I personally need Flash, however when needed, I want to have an
option. Firefox is supported by these means.
7, Solving problems with webpages. Firefox is well-known and many webs
tend to be compatible with, I can use the stronger position. However, I
could hardly argue with the "Epiphany". What is it? Can we eat it? Or is
it related to some religion?
Summary: You would like to get rid of Firefox. I am annoyed by ugly and
uncapable Epiphany and would like to get rid of it too. There are also
reasons why someone wants to use TB or Evolution.
Let them both in and let the people make the choice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
