Hi Andreas, Am So den 1. Okt 2006 um 23:07 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Can you please elaborate more on this diversion problem? I do not
~> dpkg-divert --list | grep fortunes
local diversion of /usr/share/games/fortunes/de/zitate to
/usr/share/games/fortunes/de/zitate.distrib
local diversion of /usr/share/games/fortunes/de/zitate.dat to
/usr/share/games/fortunes/de/zitate.dat.distrib
And in the postinst-file I find:
...
ln -sf /usr/share/games/fortunes-de/${j}.dat
/usr/share/games/fortunes/de/${j}.dat
...
So the diversion for the text file work but the one for the dat file is
ignored.
> understand whether I should change something in fortunes-de, to
> circumvent this, reassign the bug to dpkg-divert or whether your local
> diversion is just broken (and we could close the bug).
See above. It is no dpkg-divert bug, its a (small) bug of the
fortunes-de package and doing a way around dpkg.
> BTW, to the Jean Paul quotes: Yes, you are right they are 50% rubish
> (at least) and I would definitely accept patches to the data files
> that remove this rubish or would you think it might make sense to
I put a small script in the attachment to remove them. ;-)
> handle the Jean Paul quotes with a separate debconf question (off by
> default)? I'm very interested in your input.
Therefor I have to answer in German: Wäre eine gute Idee, falls
irgendjemand in den geistigen Ergüssen dieser Person interessiert sein
sollte. ;-)
Gruß
Klaus
--
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.de/
pub 2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B
wipe_jean_paul.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
