martin f krafft wrote: > maintainer does check for /proc and fails gracefully in its absence.
last time when i asked you to add a /proc check, you told me you wouldn't accept the patch (well, it was looking for /etc/debian_chroot to not mount proc, so this one here is better, but at the time, there was no /proc check in it at all). > Anyway, I am moderately certain that the bug is the same as #390756 > and has thus been fixed in -7. let's close it then. >> * there are cases where it is not possible to unmount a mounted /proc >> in a chroot if certain (unkillable) processes access it. since only >> rebooting the whole system helps, we do not mount /proc in the >> chroot. > > Wouldn't a lazy umount help? you can't unmount /proc when it's in use. however, since fixing all those packages who depends (unecessaryily, from a live point of view) on mounted /proc seems to be the greater problem, than just LART those users who make things which results in those unkillable processes, i consider to mount /proc by default in a future revision. daniel, already waiting for 'live-package forced me to reboot my system because i couldn't unmount the chroots /proc anymore'-bugreports... -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
