On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:56:34PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 11:13 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:16:20AM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > * Aurélien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 10:56]: > > > > Would it be possible to have a list of such proposed architectures? > > > > > > amd64, s390z, powerpc64, netbsd-i386 and other variants, sh3/sh4, m32r > > > > ppc64 is not currently a candidate for a separate arch, > > > If that's the case, could you close #263743.
Ah ... Well, this bug report was done by the (two ?) guys from the unofficial ppc64 project at alioth, and they have their own need, maybe. I speak as a powerpc porter interested in ppc64 biarch support, and involved with other ppc64 guys. Now, i tried to build ppc64 kernels with make-kpkg and a cross compiler, and i was hit by the exact same bug, and i believe that Tollef's multi-arch support would also have need of it. The official arch name is ppc64 though, at least from the kernel developer's side. Friendly, Sven Luther
