Thomas Lange wrote: > Yes maybe, but IMO it's not that bad to use the hooks directory.
I accept that. >Hook > extend the FAI function is some way. Defining an own action is also > some sort of extension. Hehe, then we should enforce to put selfwritten ( by users) scripts and classes also in the hooks directory, they are some sort of exntension :) O.k, just a joke, but to be honest, I am a fan of having good to perfect naming and definitions. When some time arrives that we change stuff in configspace anyway, we should think about a better name for the directory. Actually, just "action" would be better, because it contains "actions" and "hooks for actions" - Both have the word "action". The opposite is not true - not both contain the word "hooks". Sounds picky, but it's the sum of many small things that makes software really good. Still, just note it for a later time... Henning -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
