On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:42:38PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > Vim maintainers, was there a specific reason vim-tiny is built without > multi-byte support or should we start building vim-tiny with that?
Isn't multi-byte support a requirement for properly editing UTF-8 files? If this is the case (as I believe), I think it is proper to have vim-tiny compiled this way due to the long standing requirement of full UTF-8 support in Debian. As vim-tiny is going to be in base I definitely do not want people to use a vim non UTF-8 compliant. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
