also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.09.1200 +0200]: > I don't want to say "everything is nice" (and please feel free to > continue working on this bug), but I don't think this bug is > release-critical aka "we need to fix it prior to release". So, setting > severity back to important (aka "this is an ugly bug and should be > fixed").
I almost agree. Even though I *have* lost data to this bug, I have not been able to work my way forward. It is a real bitch. Anyway, wouldn't it be better to leave it at "grave" (aka causes data loss) but tag it etch-ignore because - I don't think we'll be able to fix it in time - gnupg cannot be removed from etch ? -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
