also sprach Mario Joußen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.09.1201 +0200]: > does it perhaps make more sense to orphan the package instead of > removing it?
Not really. I is 2.4 only and there will be no 2.4 kernels in etch. So no point in orphaning it. > Do you think, that upstream is dead? Or what do you mean with "I don't > want to be upstream for the package"? No, upstream is alive and well. I meant to say that I don't want to maintain the package. Upstream has released version 3.2 two years ago. If you update the package to this version, it can stay in etch. Cheers, -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "it is easier to be a lover than a husband for the simple reason that it is more difficult to be witty every day than to say pretty things from time to time." -- honoré de balzac
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
