Hi Philipp,
On 10/10/06, Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be nice to see aiccu in etch/main and autobuilt. This
> discussion started on 2006-08-12, the maintainer did not respond until
> now although he was copied on the whole conversation. (Which is, by the
> way, archived in debian-email on master.)
And two months later there is not a single reply of the maintainer, so
aiccu is stuck in non-free for Etch. Heh.
Correct. It will be in non-free unless clause 5 is fixed in the licence.
So,
1. The *new* version of their licence has an IETF "should" clause.
2. The clarification (when written) was specific to Debian; so that
violated Social Contract #8.
Having read: <http://www.sixxs.net/tools/aiccu/LICENSE>
I can see the clarification is now actually mentioned in their LICENCE
as opposed to being just an email. So this comes down to whether or
not I believe their clarification overrules the actual text of the
licence.
In light of the email exchange between Jereon and yourself -- and his
"attitude" -- I'm inclined to be highly conservative, and this I do
not believe Pim's clairification override the licence.
I say this on the basis that I actually *did* let Jeroen know what I
was doing. He, like me, was obviously fairly busy, and I take silence
as consent.
Anand, are you MIA? Then please set the vacation flag in the database. I
see occasional reportbug activity in Echelon, but no PGP activity since
2006-08-13.
No, I'm not MIA - I'm just busy. Very busy with a startup that
launches on the 20th of this month.
Echelon is not as a good an indicator of activity as you might believe
-- it appears it's ability to detect activity on the basis of bug
reports and mailing list postings isn't working as well it could.
Anand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
