Package: mesa Version: 6.5.1-0.1 The upstream release consisted of 3 packages:
d9a555297319bb932a3192952d53d073 MesaLib-6.5.1.tar.gz c46f2c6646a270911b791dd8e1c2d977 MesaLib-6.5.1.tar.bz2 939eaaff33322bfeafac784402b45f4f MesaLib-6.5.1.zip 9e4bbe83c007bfbaa67449a81cc3d36a MesaDemos-6.5.1.tar.gz 0f2794baf7a9d98b22caea9f78c6942d MesaDemos-6.5.1.tar.bz2 14c77eab9cc7a265c331abf239927c1c MesaDemos-6.5.1.zip c5f87c23aaf4eaf1bda0d007ea98366c MesaGLUT-6.5.1.tar.gz 2525642fe7f454e3e1a1aad01359b406 MesaGLUT-6.5.1.tar.bz2 e33b165c22551e23b58ede8767378543 MesaGLUT-6.5.1.zip In the Debian archive, mesa_6.5.1.orig.tar.gz contains the files from MesaLib and MesaDemos. All the files from MesaGLUT are in mesa_6.5.1-0.1.diff.gz, aside from a single empty file which cannot be represented in a diff. Whoever uploads the next upstream version should take more care to produce a correct tarball. I believe current best practice when using multiple upstream tarballs is to use a nested tarball instead of reapcking. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] shortened to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you've signed my GPG key, please send a signature on and to the new uid. Anthony's Law of Force: Don't force it, get a larger hammer.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
