On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:16:14 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:

> > >    /usr/share/doc/liblpsolve55-dev/examples/demo must be moved to 
> > > something
> > > like /usr/bin/liblpsolve-demo or somewhere in /usr/lib.
> > Cf. the attached patch.
> Broken patch, IMHO. I understand that reasoning for programs/stuff to
> use but not for demos.
> Demos belong into /usr7share/doc, nothing relies on that etc.

If I understand the FHS correctly architecture specific files must
not be installed beneath /usr/share.
 
> *If* the above is not allowed I'd prefer to not ship "demo" at all instead
> of shipping it in a patch no one will look at at. Unless you also create
> a symlink...

I've been thinking about that, too.
 
> And why are you sending a pathh containg "NMU" (idirectly threatinging
> with it) for a (IMHO non-)RC bug which is only 4 days old?

A patch (from a non-DD) is not more than an offer ...
 
gregor 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Bob Dylan: Don't Think Twice, It's All Right

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to