retitle 394052 ppp: report mtu value used
thanks

False report.
I played with mtu configuration option and it does effect the traffic;
it's not reflected in debug output though.

So, let's reformulate this: when pppd says it negotiated a certain client
mru value, which differs (being larger, it seems) from the actual mtu it
will use, it should say so and tell which mtu that is.

I still have the packets not reaching the client problem, but I'm not sure
at this point why they're not.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:56:41AM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> 
> I'm trying to connect Windows systems as VPN roadwarriors to a gateway
> running ppp over l2tp over ipsec. The gateway is in Singapore, and has
> non-ideal internet connection (mainly, the MTU/MRU had to be lowered
> for some things to work properly).
> 
> For ppp, I set mtu and mru as well:
> 
> ...
> mtu 1200
> mru 1200
> ...
> 
> Checking the ppp log, the client asks for a mru of 1400, larger than what
> the ppp configuration has set as mtu; pppd happily acknowledges it despite
> its lower mtu setting. It looks like the mtu configuration is ignored and
> pppd starts sending packets larger than what the tcp-ip (and thus ipsec)
> layer of the gateway can send.
> 
> ...
> Oct 18 15:24:00 scotos pppd[16120]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1200> 
> <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap MS-v2> <magic 0x9fcb8fc7> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Oct 18 15:24:00 scotos pppd[16120]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1400> 
> <magic 0x2c3d20c0> <pcomp> <accomp> <endpoint 
> [local:95.21.d7.70.e2.45.4b.6a.ad.23.8b.3d.b6.46.05.06.00.00.00.02]>]
> Oct 18 15:24:00 scotos pppd[16120]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1400> 
> <magic 0x2c3d20c0> <pcomp> <accomp> <endpoint 
> [local:95.21.d7.70.e2.45.4b.6a.ad.23.8b.3d.b6.46.05.06.00.00.00.02]>]


Regards,

Filip


http://www.sysfs.be/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to