If you would read the changelog as well as other bug reports you would find that acidlab is actually a patched version of 0.9.6b20 with parts of 0.9.6b22 as the upstream version AS IS is unable to be included in the Debian distribution due to licensing issues.
Regards, Jeremy
Point taken, although I saw no mention of it in either README.Debian or the bug report in question. I found it out for myself (but not till after I'd submitted the bug report stuff) when I tried to do a uupdate on the current upstream source.
It seems that I also incorrectly, as it turns out, believed the upstream changelog when he seemed to intimate that the problem that you could only select years well in the past had been fixed. Perhaps I misread it, 'cause it isn't. In any case, my motivation for submitting the report was to indicate that your statement that the problem didn't exist in sarge was not true. At least it isn't as of today anyway.
I will probably write a simple script to update the year fields in these files, since I have several boxes to do it on. Would you be interested in a copy for inclusion in the acidlab package?
.....Ron
-- Ron Murray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.rjmx.net/~ron GPG Public Key Fingerprint: F2C1 FC47 5EF7 0317 133C D66B 8ADA A3C4 D86C 74DE
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
