Bug#383327: is this bug still legit?

[Arias Hung]

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Danial Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]) delivered an accurate 
usplash bug report:

Installed Usplash is active only on system shutdown. Two action are             
                  missing the installation script to activate it on system boot.

 1. Add 'splash' to the boot commandline else Usplash will not start

  /etc/init.d/usplash start will call console-screen.sh at the end of boot 
process anyway.

2. Delete the link /etc/rcS.d/S48console-screen.sh else Usplash gets terminated prematurely by console-screen.sh

I've noticed that splash=silent is now auto added to the boot commandline.

However, S48console-screen.sh in rcS.d is still present.  Is this premature
termination intentional?

If S48console-screen.sh is deleted, console-screen.sh is not called by usplash 
until the very end of runlevel 2 at rc2.d/S98usplash.

Is it accurate to manually delete or at least divert S48console-screen.sh while 
usplash is installed? And if so, why hasn't this procedure been added to the 
usplash postinstall script?

Please let us know.

Thanks for the time you've put into this aesthetically beautiful contribution!

A

pgpfrcOspqHDY.pgp
Description: PGP signature