On Thu, Nov 02, 2006, Mike Hommey wrote: > > * Package name : mach > Why does it have to have the same name as a well know (old) micro-kernel?
This is an upstream question, but the upstream says: 1. WHAT IS IT ? --------------- ... This mach is not to be confused with the microkernel of the same name. If you can't tell the difference between this mach and that mach from a cursory look then neither is for you. Since the name isn't used in package or source names, I picked it; I'm open to renaming later on if necessary. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>