reopen 395368 ! thanks
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:36:48 +0100 Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see no need to change anything here. The program does what it says > it does... It's a classic design disagreement, an example favorable to my side would be the introduction of automobile safety belts -- some automakers (and drivers) didn't want them, and destructively reasoned that a car doesn't drive itself therefore all crashes were some driver's fault. An example sympathetic to your view might be found in Jack Williamson's 'Humanoid' stories, where robots imprison humanity so as to protect them from harm. No need to agree. If error messages and consistent output in response to unexpected data are a "feature" you never intended and don't wish to implement, then change this bug's severity to "wishlist" and tag it "wontfix". Bonus: this open bug might ward off finicky users. HTH... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
