Frank Küster wrote: > Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Package: texlive-latex-extra >> Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2 >> Severity: normal >> >> texlive-latex-extra claims to contain beamer, but does not. > > Ah, interesting. It's texlive-latex-recommended that Recommends: > latex-beamer. > > One part of the fix is going to be:
Wait a second. IIRC moving beamer from texlive-latex-extra to texlive-latex-recommended was part of the TPM reorganisation done some time ago. It simply does not make sense to have the (old) prosper in texlive-latex-recommended while the currently used beamer or powerdot are in texlive-latex-extra. Hence I think it is only the description that has to be fixed. cheerio ralf
