On Wed, Nov 08, 2006, David Härdeman wrote: > Would you be willing to test the attached patch? It should solve both > bugs you reported today.
I read the patch, and I believe it resolves the issues. I wonder why you prefer ignoring all errors returned by get_lvm_deps instead of silencing the correct one as I proposed in my patch, but eh it's your code. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>