Package: libpisock-dev Version: 0.12.1-5 Severity: grave
I have somehow misinterpreted 393792 so I file my comments as a separate bug. It seems tha libpisock has changed, so tha programs build-depending on libpisock-dev needs major adoptions to work with libpisock9 It looks like the case that 1) packages builds against new api without source changes 2) packages does not work with new api without source changes A author of another program using libpisock writes in 393792 writes: > Yes, pilot-addresses is limited in it's current form but the original > bug in kpilot is far more likely to be caused by kpilot not making > sufficient upstream changes to migrate to the libpisock9 API. > libpisock8 was part of pilot-link 0.11 and pilot-link 0.12 took three > years to be released - there are significant changes, hence the API > change from 8 to 9. This is very strongly related to 394534 /Sune -- System Information: Debian Release: unstable/experimental APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-vserver-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libpisock-dev depends on: ii libncurses5-dev [libncurses-d 5.5-5 Developer's libraries and docs for ii libpisock9 0.12.1-5 library for communicating with a P ii libpisync0 0.12.1-5 synchronization library for PalmOS ii libusb-dev 2:0.1.12-2 userspace USB programming library libpisock-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
