Package: elinks Followup-For: Bug #296976 #296976 is marked as serious against elinks. However, it seems to me that it's just the sgml2x package not using the right option when calling elinks.
Should this really prevent elinks 0.10.2-2 from getting into sarge? Cheers, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - http://larve.net/people/hugo/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature