>> So the dependency is actually there. It's not >><perfect but I don't know about any better way that would satisfy >> both >> SBCL and CMUCL users.
Yes, i understand that the sbcl and cmucl lisp implementation seem to differ significantly in this area. >> Is this OK or do you have any suggestion >> how to >> improve the dependencies I cannot help, sorry. I am just a normal user and not familiar with debians package dependency system. For the meantime its perfectly ok with me. Also i have to say that i quickly found out the missing package with a apt-cache search. I guess for an advanced lisper, which i am not (yet), the issue can be handled easily. -- "Ein Herz für Kinder" - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion: www.deutschlandsegelt.de Unser Dankeschön: Ihr Name auf dem Segel der 1. deutschen America's Cup-Yacht! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
