severity 400728 normal
tags 400728 moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 12:09:53PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The source package 'unionfs' did build binary modules in a previous
> version. They were moved to linux-modules-extra-2.6.
>
> Please remove the leftover on arm of the ancient module packages build
> out of 'unionfs' (and not linux-modules-extra-2.6).
They are currently still built:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dak ls -S unionfs -s unstable
unionfs-modules-2.6-footbridge | 1.3+debian-3 | unstable | arm
unionfs-modules-2.6-ixp4xx | 1.3+debian-3 | unstable | arm
unionfs-modules-2.6-nslu2 | 1.3+debian-3 | unstable | arm
unionfs-modules-2.6-rpc | 1.3+debian-3 | unstable | arm
unionfs-modules-2.6-s3c2410 | 1.3+debian-3 | unstable | arm
unionfs-source | 1.4+debian-3 | unstable | all
unionfs-tools | 1.4+debian-2 | unstable | alpha, amd64, arm, m68k, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
unionfs-tools | 1.4+debian-3 | unstable | hppa, i386, ia64
unionfs-utils | 1.4+debian-3 | unstable | all
unionfs | 1.4+debian-3 | unstable | source
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src unionfs-modules-2.6-footbridge
package | version | source
--------------------------------+--------------+---------
unionfs-modules-2.6-footbridge | 1.3+debian-3 | unionfs
(1 row)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is, those 5 binary packages were built by the current version of
unionfs.
If they are 'leftover' and 'ancient', they must not be built anymore,
preferably by having the source package refusing to do so, but
alternative means are also imaginable.
This requires a new unionfs upload, because the binary packages are not
out-of-date (and removing non-out-of-date stuff can yield weird results,
I'm not willing to do that generally).
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
