On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:32:38PM +0100, Adam Cécile wrote: > You're build-depending on libsndfile-dev which is a virtual package > without depending on a real package. I guess this is a policy violation.
AFAIK, unversioned dependencies on virtual packages are allowed. Would you mind pointing me to the section of the policy you're referring to? > The proper way to do is to depend on libsndfile1-dev (>= 1.0.10) | > libsndfile-dev (>= 1.0.10). I don't see how this can work because versioned dependencies on virtual packages are not supported. > This will ensure the minimum libsndfile version requirement is available > and will allow distribution, on which libsndfile-dev install > libsndfile0-dev, like ubuntu dapper, to build the package. But the virtual package dependencies should work fine on dapper as-is right? So what problem does this actually solve? -- CJ van den Berg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
