Steve Langasek wrote: > This sounds to me like it means the package is not vulnerable by > default, is that correct? Should this bug be downgraded to > 'important'?
Yes, and there's nothing we can do as maintainers to fix this, depending on how people set up their servers. I included info on how to deal with this in NEWS.Debian and considered this closed. Thanks, Vorlon, you see everything :) -- ยท''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution : :' : -- Emma Goldman `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
