On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:48:55AM +0100, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> #include <hallo.h>
> * Mike Hommey [Wed, Dec 06 2006, 08:36:16PM]:
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:02:19PM +0100, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > #include <hallo.h>
> > > * Adrian Bunk [Tue, Dec 05 2006, 11:16:49AM]:
> > > > Package: icedax
> > > > Version: 9:1.1.0-1
> > > > Severity: wishlist
> > > >
> > > > The name icedax sounds as if it was one more of the Debian
> > > > Mozilla versions iceape/icedove/iceweasel
> > > > (especially for German people: German "Dachs" = badger).
> > > >
> > > > Could you name it differently?
> > >
> > > I disagree (speaking for myself only). That would mean that Debian
> > > enforces a strict name policy in exchange for another strict (and
> > > trademark protected) naming policy.
> > >
> > > ice{ape,dove,weasel} sound like forks of <censored> for Debian&others,
> > > and icedax is another fork of <censored> for Debian&others. I don't see
> > > why it should not share the namespace of the low-temperature zoo.
> >
> > If you felt that using the same namespace than mozilla products "forks"
> > was so cool, why didn't you rename mkisofs icesomethingelse ?
>
> Because icesomethingelse sounds even uglier. And icesomethingelse would
> be used then, the next fork would not
> icesomethingelsebutnottheothericesomethingelse as the binary name.
>
> And most other names have been used already... and dax has some meaning
> (Digital Audio eXtraction).
It could have been icegii, as Generate Iso Image. Or whatever.
So, why not just dax for cdda2wav ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
