On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:53:23PM -0500, James Vega wrote: > tag 379839 wontfix > thanks
It's OK for me to ignore the insufficient contrast introduced by more supported color modes but please note that this bug report was initially about a wrong color scheme. > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:35:47PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:03:24AM -0500, James Vega wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > > > > > Hi, I noticed that the default color schema of vimdiff is wrong, since > > > > > added lines in one of the files are not visible because foreground and > > > > > background color are identical. This isn't a "won't fix"! > > The contrast is nevertheless bad. Bright blue on blue or pink on red are > > not optimal. The older settings where better. > > I agree that the contrast is bad, but there's only so much you can do > with the limited color set available in a terminal. More syntax > > I'm tagging this as wontfix since there's not much to do about it even > though I agree that it can be problematic. It applies not to the initial problem. If you have a patch and want to see this in Etch I could provide a German translation update if necessary to bypass the freeze :-) Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]